Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. City of Hoover

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 22, 1991No. 1901358Published

1Opinion of the Court

590 So.2d 245 (1991)

Kay BLANKENSHIP, et al.

v.

CITY OF HOOVER and Richard Smith, as Finance Director of the City of Hoover.

1901358.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

November 22, 1991.

George C. Douglas, Jr. of Gaines, Gaines & Gaines, P.C., Talladega, for appellants.

Jack H. Harrison, Talladega, for appellee.

HOUSTON, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Kay Blankenship, Ann Marich, and Martha Stone, sued the City of Hoover, Alabama ("Hoover"), and Richard Smith, its finance director and custodian of records ("the finance director"), seeking a preliminary injunction; an order requiring Hoover "to produce [various]…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Stone v. Consolidated Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Lanier v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Chambers v. Birmingham News CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API