Commonwealth v. Ortiz
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
Appellant, Jose Ortiz, was convicted by a jury of rape, simple assault, indecent assault and corrupting the morals of a minor. The trial court granted appellant’s post-verdict motion in arrest of judgment as to the charge of corrupting the morals of a minor because that charge was not in the original complaint and that complaint was improperly cor rected to include it. Appellant was sentenced to a period of seven and one-half to fifteen years imprisonment for rape and a consecutive term of three years probation for indecent assault. That sentence was subsequently vacated because…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McNealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. BowesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Commonwealth v. SeeleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. WatsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by12 opinions
- Com. v. Gilliam, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- United States v. JahagirdarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Commonwealth v. RitchieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. McIlvaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.