Legal Opinion
Brown v. Doe
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 1, 1993No. 89 Civ. 2920 (VLB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*157MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on behalf of petitioner Samuel Brown, presenting arguments grouped into twenty-one (21) points, as grounds for requiring reversal of his 1984 state court conviction for felony murder, robbery and other crimes associated with the so-called Brinks robbery.
In my memorandum order dated October 16, 1992,1 1 found all but one of petitioner’s arguments lacking in merit. I deferred decision on that argument for the reasons discussed in part IV of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. George T. KattarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Allen v. City of YonkersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Brown v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- People v. Brown, New York County Courts1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Samuel Brown v. John Doe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Dollar Dry Dock Bank v. DenningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Mosiurchak v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Mosqueda v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993