Legal Opinion
Brown v. Doe
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 16, 1992No. 89 Civ. 2920 (VLB)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.
I
This petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on behalf of petitioner Samuel Brown, presents many arguments grouped into twenty-one (21) points, many of them overlapping, as grounds for requiring reversal of his state court conviction. I defer decision on the grounds discussed in part IV of this memorandum order, and conclude that none of petitioner’s other claims has merit.
Petitioner makes no claim of insufficiency of evidence or that the case against him was thin or, indeed, anything…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Samuel Brown v. John Doe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BertoliDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- United States v. GiampaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Dollar Dry Dock Bank v. DenningDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Hertz v. Consolidated Fisheries, Inc. The Crescent No. 2Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.