Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Graybill v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1976No. 2386PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This appeal questions the procedure by which an aircraft was ordered forfeited because it was used in violation of the game laws.

Appellant Graybill was charged on two counts: (I) possession and (II) attempted transportation of a bear hide by airplane 1 when not permitted to do so by applicable regulations, in violation of AS 16.05.920. 2 After a jury trial, Graybill was convicted on both counts. On Count I (possession) he was given a six-month suspended sentence. On Count II (attempted transportation) he was sentenced to a one-year revocation of his hunting license and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. One 1960 Cadillac CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. W. A. Compton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  5. People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. One 1965 OldsmobileIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. F/V AMERICAN EAGLE v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Resek v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. One Cocktail Glass v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Constantine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
  5. Constantine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API