Legal Opinion

ALDERMAN AND ALDERMAN v. Pollack

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 20, 2007No. AC 26679PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, C. J.

The law firm of Alderman & Alderman (Alderman) appeals from the judgments of the trial court denying its application to vacate an arbitration award and confirming the award of $11,000 in favor of its former client, Ronald Pollack. On appeal, Alderman claims that the court should have vacated the award because the arbitrators (1) exceeded their authority by granting Pollack a refund, which went beyond the scope of the parties’ submission, and (2) violated an agreed upon rule of arbitration by setting forth findings in their written decision. We affirm the judgments of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrity v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Carroll v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. In re Curtis & Castle ArbitrationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  5. Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Connecticut State Employees Ass'n, SEIU Local 2001Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Bridgeport Fire Fighters Local 998 v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Griffin v. Ark. Healthcare Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  4. DeRose v. Jason Robert's, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  5. Progressive Eldercare Services, Inc. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API