United States v. Keller
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
Defendant convicted of violating 18 U. S.C.A. § 1463,1 i. e., that he “did knowingly deposit for mailing a postal card -X- * * upon which language of an indecent character was written”, moves for judgment of acquittal, F.R.Crim.P. Rule 29(a), and in arrest of judgment, Id. Rule 34,18 U.S.C.A.
Defendant, a married man, mailed from Pennsylvania to an unmarried fe*941male in Kentucky nineteen postal cards purportedly describing their previous intimate sexual relationship and broken friendship. Defendant was indicted in nineteen counts, one as to each postal card containing a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. James S. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Diallo v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Ray Allen Tollett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973