Legal Opinion

Hayden v. Dunlap

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 18, 1935No. 11647PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

This is an action for deceit, founded upon false representations and promises made by A. A. Hayden and J. Howard Hayden to John B. Dunlap, inducing Dunlap to purchase certain shares of stock of the Hayden Manufacturing Company, a corporation, from one L. A. Garlock, resigning a position he then had with L. H. Lacy Paving Company and accepting a position with the Hayden Manufacturing Company. The corporation’s general demurrer to the plaintiff’s petition was sustained, and upon refusal to amend the action against it, was dismissed.

In his petition, the plaintiff alleges that on or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago, Texas & Mexican Central Railway Co. v. TitteringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stone v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Thomas v. BeckeringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Success Motivation Institute, Inc. v. LawlisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  5. Allison v. BlewettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API