Howard v. Hughes
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, GIBBONS, J.:
In this proceeding, we are asked to clarify the property interest presumptions outlined in Sack v. Tomlin, 110 Nev. 204, 871 P.2d 298 (1994), and Langevin v. York, 111 Nev. 1481, 907 P.2d 981 (1995). Under Sack, cotenants are presumed to equally share property, "unless circumstances indicate otherwise." Sack, 110 Nev. at 213, 871 P.2d at 304. Additionally, the presumption of equal shares may be rebutted through unequal contributions to property by unrelated cotenants who lack donative intent. Id. If successfully rebutted, fractional shares are based on the amount…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Trident Construction Corp. v. West Electric, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1989
- Williams v. MonzingoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Sack v. TomlinNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Dynamic Transit Co. v. Trans Pacific Ventures, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Langevin v. YorkNevada Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Demoney-Hendrickson v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2023