Legal Opinion

United States v. Red Bird

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided July 5, 2001No. CR 01-30047PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

KORNMANN, District Judge.

[¶ 1] The defendant, Andrew Red Bird (“Red Bird”), filed a motion (Doc. 18) to suppress statements allegedly made jointly by Red Bird to an agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and a criminal investigator for the Rosebud Sioux Tribe; the motion raises a Sixth Amendment issue and a voluntariness issue. The same motion seeks to suppress six buccal swabs and DNA evidence derived therefrom on a claim of “fruits of the poisonous tree.” U.S. Magistrate Judge Moreno, after conducting an evidentiary hearing, filed and served a report and recommendation (Doc. 32)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. AvantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Andrew Red BirdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2002
  4. United States v. Paul A. KruegerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Alston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API