Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Red Bird
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2002No. 01-2796PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The United States of America challenges the district court’s 1 order granting Andrew Red Bird’s motion to suppress a statement obtained in violation of the Sixth Amendment. We affirm.
I. Background
On September 11, 2000, Red Bird was charged by criminal complaint and arraigned on a rape charge in the Rosebud Sioux Tribal Court. He pled not guilty. The tribal court appointed an attorney for him, and he was represented in the arraignment proceedings by a Rosebud Sioux Public Defender, a licensed attorney in the state of South Dakota who is admitted to practice in the United…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Cyril S. Plumman, Also Known as Steve PlummanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Chavez v. WeberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. CokerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Elvira CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gary MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.