Legal Opinion

United States v. Danley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 30, 1972No. 24,939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Chief Judge:

Convicted by general court-martial, the accused is before us on petition, contending that the evidence is insufficient to support findings of guilty of fraudulent enlistment and larceny of the variable reenlistment bonus which he consequently obtained.

Specialist Danley initially enlisted in the Army on April 18, 1967, for a term of three years. While serving in Vietnam, he reenlisted on April 7, 1968, also for a term of three years. On the same date, he was paid a variable reenlistment bonus, accruing only to those soldiers who were reenlisting for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. LaRueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. NazarioUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. HolbrookU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  3. United States v. DodsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. HowajrahU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. HolbrookU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API