United States v. Danley
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Chief Judge:
Convicted by general court-martial, the accused is before us on petition, contending that the evidence is insufficient to support findings of guilty of fraudulent enlistment and larceny of the variable reenlistment bonus which he consequently obtained.
Specialist Danley initially enlisted in the Army on April 18, 1967, for a term of three years. While serving in Vietnam, he reenlisted on April 7, 1968, also for a term of three years. On the same date, he was paid a variable reenlistment bonus, accruing only to those soldiers who were reenlisting for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. LaRueUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. NazarioUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. HolbrookU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
- United States v. DodsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. HowajrahU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. HolbrookU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.