Legal Opinion

Bodrey v. Cape

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1969No. 44550PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Presiding Judge.

There is the preliminary question of whether the transcript of evidence from the habeas corpus matter could properly be considered in this action on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The trial judge,'in denying plaintiff’s motion, made no reference to what he considered in making his determination.

On motion for summary judgment “[t]he court is authorized to examine proffered materials extraneous to the pleadings, not for the purpose of trying an issue, but to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact to be tried.” 6 Moore’s Federal Practice §…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Pinkerton National Detective Agency, Inc. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Madison v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Mallette v. MalletteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc. v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Ellenberg v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Goldsmith v. American Food Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Elmore v. Atlantic Zayre, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API