Legal Opinion

Ellenberg v. Pinkerton's, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1972No. 46481PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Judge.

It is well settled that one is not responsible for the torts of its independent contractor except in those instances set out in Code § 105-502.

We assume for the purposes of this opinion that Central of Georgia introduced facts tending to establish that contractually Pinkerton’s was not its employee. It was shown that Central of Georgia assumed no control over the manner or means of achieving the aim for which Pinkerton’s was employed but merely selected Pinkerton’s to accomplish an “activities check.” The issue here is whether, as a matter of law, Central of Georgia could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Pinkerton National Detective Agency, Inc. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. McDaniel v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Bodrey v. CapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McLain v. Boise Cascade CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States Shoe Corp. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. FPI Atlanta, L.P. v. SeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. PEACHTREE-CAIN COMPANY v. McBeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. FPI Atlanta, L.P. v. SeatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API