Legal Opinion

Koter v. Cosgrove

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge COHN.

The primary question we are asked here to decide is whether taxpayers can challenge the result of a ballot referendum in equity, rather than under the auspices of Section 201.1 of the Pennsylvania Election Code (Election Code), 1 the latter of which contains specific time deadlines for such challenges. We must also consider whether a petition to intervene, for purposes of appeal, was properly granted by the trial court.

Plaintiffs, who are Appellants here at No. 486 C.D. 2003, are registered voters within the City of Wilkes-Barre, Luzerne County. Plaintiffs initiated an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brodt v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Stilp v. HaferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. In Re Petition to Contest the General Election for District JusticeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Gunnett v. TroutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Chairge v. Exeter Borough Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Quest Diagnostics Venture, LLC v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Greylock Arms, Inc. v. KroizCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Southeastern Chester County Refuse Authority v. Board of Supervisors of London Grove TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. In re Condemnation of Land at Rear of 700 Summit Avenue Jenkintown PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In re Contest of Election of November 4, 2003 on the Public Question of Home RuleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API