Legal Opinion

Consolidated Amusement Co. v. Hughes

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit. Hon. T. B. Stuart, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

QUARLES, J.

Tlie plaintiff filed its bill in equity in the circuit court of tbe first judicial circuit seeking to enjoin the defendants Hughes, the Variety Film Exchange Company, and Henry Bredhoff from exhibiting a motion picture film, known as Three Weeks, at the Popular Theatre in Honolulu, or elsewhere in the Territory of Hawaii, and from leasing or renting *551the said film for exhibition in any place in the Territory of Hawaii. In its bill the plaintiff alleges that it is the owner of the three ]Drincipal theatres in Honolulu and does an extensive film business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grow v. SeligmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Young Chun v. RobinsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nuuanu Valley Ass'n v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Akai v. LewisHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Marshall Construction Co. v. BigelowHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  4. In Re the Estate of FosterHawaii Supreme Court · 1936
  5. In re Kaimuki Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API