Legal Opinion

People v. Fuqua

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1963No. Crim. 4179PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, P. J.

Defendants Manley Fuqua, Kenneth Hendricks, Clement Anderson and Joseph Wilmoth were jointly charged with illegal possession of heroin in violation of Health and Safety Code, section 11500. Defendant Fuqua was also charged with six prior convictions of felony, deféndant Hendricks with one, and defendant Anderson with one. Following a trial by jury, defendants Fuqua and Hendricks were convicted of the offense charged. The jury was unable to agree upon a verdict as to defendants Anderson and Wilmoth. Defendant Fuqua alone appeals from the judgment of conviction.

The evidence may be summarized as…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. McMurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. People v. ArendsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. BrajevichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. SatterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. SatterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. WeizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API