Legal Opinion

National Bank v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1936No. Docket No. 99, Calendar No. 39,033PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtToy, J.

Plaintiff brings this action in assumpsit to recover from defendant city, taxes paid under protest. The case was tried without jury and plaintiff had judgment for a portion of its claim. Both parties appeal from such judgment.

Plaintiff’s claim is divided in two parts: first, it seeks to recover the amount paid under protest, representing a tax of the year 1934, upon the amount of Federal reserve bank stock owned by it, and which was not allowed as a deduction by defendant in determining the assessed valuation of plaintiff ’s shares of common stock; second, it claims recovery of the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Trust Co. v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. National Bank of Detroit v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. First National Bank v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manufacturers National Bank v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API