Legal Opinion

State v. Jacks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Indictment for retailing without license. Indictment quashed. The indictment charges that “ Thomas Jacks, on the 14th day of November, 1875, at,” etc., “ did then and there, unlawfully, for the purpose of gain, sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, to one James Cornell, he, the said Thomas Jacks, not being then and there licensed to sell intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time.” The objections to the indictment were, that it did not state the quantity nor the price of the liquor sold.

It was held, in Divine v. The State, 4 Ind. 240, and in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Divine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Hare v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  4. State v. MondyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Hubbard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Arbintrode v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. State v. AllenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. City of Cannelton v. CollinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API