Legal Opinion
Santana Products Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 9, 2005No. 03-1845, 03-2283, 03-2481PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge.
In order to persuade government architects to specify Bobrick’s toilet partitions *126for use in government projects, Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.,1 its architectural representative, the Hornyak Group, Inc., and its sales representative, Vogel Sales Co.-, were telling architects that the partitions of Santana Products, Inc., posed a fire hazard under fire safety codes. As a result, Santana brought claims against Bo-brick, Hornyak, and Vogel for anti-trust violations of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, for false advertising under the Lan-ham Act, and for state law…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- United States v. OteroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Board of Regents Ex Rel. University of Texas v. KST Electric, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2008
- Infosage, Inc. v. Mellon Ventures, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.