Legal Opinion

Rasheed v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 24, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Essentially, Rasheed is asking this court to review the Superior Court’s denial of his most recent new trial motion pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. R 30, as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001). Rasheed attempted to appeal from that denial to the Appeals Court, but his notice of appeal was untimely. Rasheed filed a motion in the Appeals Court, requesting leave to file a late notice of appeal pursuant to Mass. R. A. P. 14 (b), as amended, 378 Mass. 939 (1979). A single justice of the Appeals Court denied the motion. Instead of appealing from that decision to a panel of the Appeals Court, Rasheed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maza v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Brossard v. West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Bernard v. United Brands Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  4. Solimine v. DavidianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marnerakis v. Phillips, Silver, Talman, Aframe & Sinrich, P.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  2. Kines v. Clerk of the Superior Court for Criminal BusinessMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. Care and Protection of PenelopeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  4. Cook v. Bos. Carmen's UnionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  5. Higgins v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API