Legal Opinion · Dissent

Converse Power Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environment Control

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 15, 2002No. 3479Published

1DissentAnderson, J.

I vote to REVERSE. Converse Power Corporation (“Converse”) was entitled to issuance of an aquaculture permit by the Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”) under the provisions of the pre-amended Regulation 61-47.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Converse appealed the denial of its aquaculture permit request and a contested case hearing was conducted before the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) on May 12, 1998.8 At this hearing, DHEC identified as the “sole basis” for its denial of Converse’s permit was its “inability to perform an inspection” in that there was no facility for DHEC to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turbeville v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  2. Byerly Ex Rel. Estate of Byerly v. ConnorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Triska v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Deese v. South Carolina State Board of DentistryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Hatcher v. South Carolina District Council of the Assemblies of God, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API