Legal Opinion

Winnemucca State Bank & Trust Co. v. Corbeil

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1919No. 2356PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Edward A. Ducker, Judge. Action by the Winnemucca State Bank and Trust Company, a corporation, against J. D. Corbeil. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. A party with the interest of the plaintiff is a real party in interest within the meaning of the statute, and is entitled to maintain the action. Consolidated Nat.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Edward A. Ducker, Judge. Action by the Winnemucca State Bank and Trust Company, a corporation, against J. D. Corbeil. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. A party with the interest of the plaintiff is a real party in interest within the meaning of the statute, and is entitled to maintain the action. Consolidated Nat. Bank v. Heverin, 77 Cal. 263; Philbrook v. Superior Court, 43 Pac. 402; Hale v. Harris, 83 N. W. 1046. “There is no objection to the assignment of choses in action to a third person for the purpose of…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Sanders, J.:

This is an action on a" promissory note.

The plaintiff, a domestic' banking corporation, alleges in its complaint that the Interstate Life Insurance Company executed and delivered to the plaintiff its promissory note for $1,000, and “delivered and left with the plaintiff, as collateral security” for its payment, that certain promissory note of the defendant in words and figures as follows, to wit:

“$800.00. Winnemucca, Nevada, Nov. 5th, 1915.
“Twelve months after date, without grace, I promise to pay to the order of Interstate Life Ins. Co. at Winne-mucca, Nevada, Eight…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Bibb v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Williams v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
  4. Norton v. Piscataqua Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Chew v. BrumagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hodge v. TruaxWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Nevada-Douglas Consolidated Copper Co. v. BerryhillNevada Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Ahlswede v. SchoneveldNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Thelin v. Intermountain Lumber & Builders Supply, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API