Legal Opinion

Michael Michelbrink, Jr. v. Washington State Patrol

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 24, 2015No. 44035-1-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.

¶1 — The Washington State Patrol (WSP) filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the superior court’s denial of summary judgment against former WSP trooper Michael Michelbrink’s lawsuit for damages resulting from being shot with a Taser 1 at the workplace as part of WSP’s Taser training. Michelbrink argued that being shot with a Taser fell within the deliberate intention exception 2 to the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act’s 3 (IIA) general prohibition of civil suits for workplace injuries. 4

¶2 In a previous opinion, we affirmed the superior court. Michelbrink v. Wash. State Patrol,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Folsom v. Burger KingWashington Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheila Larose, Appellant/cross-resp v. King County And Pda, Respondent/cross-appellantsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Board of McPherson County Comm'rs v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. Cockrum v. C.H. Murphy/Clark-Ullman, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API