Municipality of Anchorage v. Alaska Distributors Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
The parties dispute whether a municipality may retroactively tax a warehouse addition as “escaped property” when it timely assessed and taxed other improvements on the real property. We hold that the municipality may so tax the warehouse under the particular circumstances of this case.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellee Alaska Distributors Co. (ADCO) owns improved property in Anchorage. In 1979, ADCO built an addition worth just over $1 million to an existing warehouse located on the property. This addition doubled the warehouse floor space. Through an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Korash v. MillsSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- Bauer-Schweitzer Malting Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Alascom, Inc. v. North Slope Borough, Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Anchorage Independent School District v. StephensAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Leyh v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- County Board of Equalization v. State Tax Commission Ex Rel. Sunkist Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Marsico Capital Management, LLC v. Denver Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Crawford v. BOARD OF JOHNSON COUNTY COMM'RS.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Crawford v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
- Bill Dunn, McCracken County Property Valuation Administrator v. Saratoga, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.