Legal Opinion

Wells Benz, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1964No. 18436_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

333 F.2d 89

WELLS BENZ, INC., a corporation, Dale Benz, Inc., a

corporation, and The Fidelity and Casualty Company

of New York, a corporation, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES of America for the Use of MERCURY ELECTRIC

COMPANY, a corporation, and Founders Insurance

Company, a corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 18435, 18436.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 2, 1964.

Betts & Loomis, Albert H. Ebright, James A. Williams, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

Wiseman & Elmore, Aaron Elmore, Beverly Hills, Cal., Anderson, McPharlin & Conners, Kenneth E. Lewis, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  3. Crocker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Kauffman v. RaederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  5. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Pottinger v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  3. Martin Bloom Associates, Inc. v. ManzieDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1975
  4. Convoy Corporation, an Oregon Corporation v. Sperry Rand Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Warren v. City of ChicoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API