United States v. Vinyard
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CLAUSE, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted, contrary to his plea, of stealing $5,800.00 worth of postal money orders in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921.
Appellant urges that his sentence is constitutionally invalid because it includes a provision for , additional confinement upon the failure to pay the fine adjudged. We disagree.
The sentence was as follows:
“To be reduced to the grade of El; To be confined at hard labor for 9 months; To pay a fine to the United States of $5,800.00; And in the event the fine is not paid to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Pedersen v. BlessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RascoeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BrownU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. CalhounU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979