Legal Opinion

United States v. Vinyard

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 24, 1977No. CM 435107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CLAUSE, Senior Judge:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his plea, of stealing $5,800.00 worth of postal money orders in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921.

Appellant urges that his sentence is constitutionally invalid because it includes a provision for , additional confinement upon the failure to pay the fine adjudged. We disagree.

The sentence was as follows:

“To be reduced to the grade of El; To be confined at hard labor for 9 months; To pay a fine to the United States of $5,800.00; And in the event the fine is not paid to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Phillip Morris v. Hiram Schoonfield, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. DeAngelisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. State Ex Rel. Pedersen v. BlessingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. RascoeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BrownU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
  3. United States v. CalhounU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API