Fosdick v. Starbuck
Indiana Supreme Court
In error.
1Opinion of the Court
THE assignee of a promissory note, given without consideration, may sue the assignor at any time, and without having previously sued the maker. Howell v. Wilson, 2 Blackf. 418.
The maker of a promissory note is a competent, witness for the plaintiff, in an action by the assignee against the assignor, involving the validity of the consideration of the note.
The statute requiring an oath to a plea, replication, &c., denying the execution of an instrument of writing, &c., does not dispense with the production of the instrument on the trial: it only excuses proof of the execution of the instrument,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Howell v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1831
3Cited by5 opinions
- Glenn v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Collins v. MagheeIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Stutsman v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Rich v. SovacoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Swiggett v. SeymourU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1868