Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1997No. E 95-40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Board of Review’s decision denying appellant, Jane Rodriguez, unemployment benefits. On appeal, appellant argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision and that the case should be remanded for further investigation. We disagree and affirm.

The record indicates that, since 1989, appellant had worked for Shinn’s Orchards planting, thinning, and harvesting peaches. She filed a claim for unemployment benefits in 1994. However, Shinn’s Orchards did not pay unemployment-insurance taxes at the time that appellant filed her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Equity Fire & Casualty Co. v. NeedhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Brown v. Director, Employment Security DivisionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. White v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hiner v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Rankin v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Barber v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Brooks v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API