Looft v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kasserman
The basic issue presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only was properly granted by the circuit court of Madison County. Plaintiff’s suit was under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. §51 et seq. (1976)) for injuries he allegedly suffered during his employment by defendant. A jury returned a general verdict of $37,500 for plaintiff, and the trial court subsequently granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the issue of damages only. This court granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal under Supreme Court Rule 306…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. LiepeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bradley v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Park District of Highland Park v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- The PEOPLE v. SawyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Stringer v. McHughAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ogg v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Simmons v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Bussell v. DeWalt Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Voss v. TuneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Watson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.