Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Wilcoxson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 2017No. 2017-0663PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of a request for reinstatement by respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II. The request was not opposed.

{¶ 2} Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that the request is granted and that respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II, Attorney Registration No. 0061974, last known address in Vandalia, Ohio, is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

{¶ 3} It is further…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dayton Bar Assn. v. WilcoxsonOhio Supreme Court · 2017

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dayton Bar Association v. Wilcoxson.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API