Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Association v. Wilcoxson.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2018No. 2017-0663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

*279 {¶ 1} Respondent, Clinton Ralph Wilcoxson II, of Vandalia, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0061974, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1993.

{¶ 2} In a formal complaint certified to the Board of Professional Conduct on March 2, 2017, relator, Dayton Bar Association, charged Wilcoxson with multiple *773 ethical violations arising from his neglect of a single matter, failure to reasonably *280 communicate with the affected client, failure to deliver the client's file to successor counsel, and failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation. Based on Wilcoxson's failure to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Kluesener (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Kluesener (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Dayton Bar Association v. HooksOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ShulerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Dayton Bar Assn. v. WilcoxsonOhio Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Schriver (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Brenner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. McCartyOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Hillman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Wilcoxson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API