Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 17, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co., Ltd. v. American Independent Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In Re the Arbitration Between El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co. & American Independent Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
- El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co., Ltd. v. American Independent Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- El Hoss Engineering & Transport Co., Ltd. v. American Independent Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- In re: CFCU Community Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009