Legal Opinion
James MacIel, Sr. v. Matthew Cates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2013No. 11-56620PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:
California state prisoner James D. Maciel appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his sentence for committing lewd and lascivious acts with force against a child. Maciel contends that the state violated Hill v. United States ex rel. Wampler, 298 U.S. 460, 56 S.Ct. 760, 80 L.Ed. 1283 (1936), by imposing a parole term and a sex-offender registration requirement that were not part of his criminal judgment. We find Maciel’s challenge to his parole term moot because he is no longer on parole. With respect to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mohamed Sabra v. Maricopa County Community CollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Peter Munoz, Jr. v. Gregory SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Hassell v. FischerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Does v. Lawrence WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Magana-Magana v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.