Legal Opinion

Carter v. McClure

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM PRANKLIN. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Franklin County. T. M. McConnell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The bill in this cause was filed by complainants, as creditors of McClure, Lucas & Co., seeking to hold the defendants liable for the debts of that concern, upon the theory that it was a commercial firm, of which defendants were members, at the time of the creation of these debts. The facts, so far as they are important in the decision of this case, and as they have been found by the Court of Chancery Appeals, are, that these defendants, with others who are not sued, all members of an Alliance lodge in the town of Huntland, in this State, entered into an agreement among themselves to raise a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Mallory v. Hanaur Oil WorksTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kenyon v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Walker v. WaitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878
  5. Hodgson v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pritchett v. Thomas Plater & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Cunnyngham v. ShelbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Doyle-Kidd Dry Goods Co. v. A. W. Kennedy & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Moore v. MayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hammond v. OtwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API