Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Pulsifer

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 5, 1970No. Civ. A. 5862PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

LEDDY, Chief Judge.

This action is brought by Steven Dun-ham, Prentiss Smith and Paul B. Weber, students at Brattleboro Union High School, to enjoin the authorities of that School from enforcing the athletic grooming code enacted December 16, 1969. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a) (2) trial of the action on the merits was advanced and consolidated with the hearing on the application for a preliminary injunction.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

From evidence presented at a hearing held on April 20, 1970, I find the following facts:

On December 15, 1969, the school authorities adopted a statement…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Breese Ex Rel. Breese v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Dwen v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Veilleux v. SpringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  4. King v. Saddleback Junior College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Hunt v. Board of Fire CommissionersNew York Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API