Legal Opinion
State v. Howard
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 2013No. 2012CA00061PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Howard,
2013-Ohio-2884.] [Please see vacated opinion at
2013-Ohio-1972.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : : NUNC PRO TUNC -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : ERICK MYDELL HOWARD : : Defendant-Appellant : CASE NO. 2012CA00061 This matter came before the Court upon appellants’ motions for reconsideration pursuant to App.R. 26(A) filed May 23, 2013. In the case at bar, this Court vacated Howard’s sentences for two reasons. The Court unanimously agreed to remand the case for failure to merge allied offenses.…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. RiveraOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.