Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Butler

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 8, 2011No. 10-P-1076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanlon, J.

The defendant argues that his motion for a new trial was wrongly denied because counsel in his first appeal was ineffective in choosing not to argue that the defendant was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. See Commonwealth v. Butler, 68 Mass. App. Ct. 658 (2007).1 We affirm.

Background.2 On September 16, 1991, a Chelsea police officer sought and obtained a complaint and a warrant in the Chelsea Division of the District Court Department (Chelsea District Court) for the defendant’s arrest; the defendant was charged with rape and unarmed burglary, both alleged to have…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Butler v. MitchellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  4. State of Iowa v. Deaonsy Smith Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API