Legal Opinion

Antelope Valley Health Care District v. Citadel Properties Lancaster, LLC

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2009No. Nos. 08-55045, 08-55254Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Citadel Properties Lancaster, LLC (Citadel) appeals the district court’s final judgment awarding Antelope Valley Health Care District (Antelope Valley) specific performance under Section 5 of the parties’ Support Agreement and denying Citadel relief under Section 2 of the Support Agreement. Citadel also appeals the district court’s decision to grant Antelope Valley attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party.

Citadel’s post-judgment sale of the property to Antelope Valley did not render Citadel’s appeal moot. Conveyance of property is insufficient to moot a case. See Muckleshoot Indian…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Preminger v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. In Re Heritage Bond LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. GGIS Insurance Services, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. California National Bank v. Woodbridge Plaza LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API