Legal Opinion

Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Catlin

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 22, 2001No. 95535PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JERRY L. GOODMAN, Presiding Judge:

1 1 This is a proceeding to review an order of a Workers Compensation Court three-judge panel modifying a trial court order by eliminating a provision calling for apportionment of benefits between two successive insurance carriers. Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we sustain the order.

I

12 Claimant Joe Catlin sustained bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome from repetitive motion during the course and seope of his employment as a welder/fitter for employer H & M Steel, Inc. He also developed complex regional pain syndrome with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  2. Southwest United Industries v. PolstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. CR INDUSTRIES v. DorseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dean v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Spirit Aerosystems v. McMillenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API