Legal Opinion

State v. Torres

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 19, 1989No. 1 CA-CR 88-342PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

A jury convicted Julian Torres of possession of a narcotic drug, and the trial court placed him on four years’ probation. On appeal, the defendant asserts the following claims of error:(1) The trial court improperly admitted evidence of a prior bad act;(2) The prosecutor commented on the defendant’s post-arrest silence;(3) Defense counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to the prosecutor’s comments on the defendant’s post-arrest silence; and(4) The trial court should have given an instruction based on State v. Willits, 96 Ariz. 184, 393 P.2d 274 (1964),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. WillitsArizona Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. IvesArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State v. GordonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  5. State v. StrongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API