Legal Opinion

State v. Fish

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 30, 2009No. 1 CA-CR 06-0675PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KESSLER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Harold Arthur Fish (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction and sentence for second degree murder. He challenges various evi-dentiary rulings made by the superior court, contends two instances of juror misconduct entitle him to a new trial and raises six issues related to the final jury instructions. For the reasons stated below and in our separate memorandum decision, we reverse and remand for a new trial. 1

BACKGROUND 2

¶ 2 In May 2004, Defendant was completing a solo day-hike in a remote area of Coconino National Forest near Strawberry when he noticed the…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BoltonArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Antoine Tyree WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. State v. MacHadoArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. FurgalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  4. R.S./s.E. v. Hon. thompson/teddy VandersArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State of Arizona v. Bryan Peter FoshayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API