Legal Opinion

Karcher v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 26, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

This action was commenced by appellant, Karcher, against the city of Louisville to recover damages for the construction, maintenance and operation of a public in'cinerator in dose proximity to his residence near Camp Taylor, which incinerator it is alleged w'as used for the burning and destruction of dead bodies and gave off offensive and obnoxious fumes and odors which permeated his home and premises and rendered it unfit for residential purposes. The answer denied the material averments of the petition with respect to the maintenance of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1839
  2. Curtis v. WinslowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1866
  3. West v. Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  4. Huntington & Kenova Land Development Co. v. Phœnix Powder Manuf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kohler v. BernheimCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. City of Frankfort v. BallewCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Colyer v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API