Legal Opinion

Huntington & Kenova Land Development Co. v. Phœnix Powder Manuf'g Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

cited 2'Wood Nuis. (3d. Ed.) -§ 820; 1 High Inj. (3d. Ed.) § 762; 13 W. Ya. 476; 32 W. Va.' 6; 34 W. Ya. 804; High Inj. § 34, p. 786; 80 Ya. 331; Wood Nuis., % 3, p. 4; Wood Nuis., § 820, p. 804; 9 Wallace 254; 18 B. Monroe 800; 1 Johnson 78; Eden Inj. 274; 11 Humphrey (Tenn.) 406. I. — The determination of the question, whether nuisance or na nuisance, when the matter complained of is not a nuisance per se, depends upon its location and the attendant circumstances; and…

Read the full summary

cited 2'Wood Nuis. (3d. Ed.) -§ 820; 1 High Inj. (3d. Ed.) § 762; 13 W. Ya. 476; 32 W. Va.' 6; 34 W. Ya. 804; High Inj. § 34, p. 786; 80 Ya. 331; Wood Nuis., % 3, p. 4; Wood Nuis., § 820, p. 804; 9 Wallace 254; 18 B. Monroe 800; 1 Johnson 78; Eden Inj. 274; 11 Humphrey (Tenn.) 406. I. — The determination of the question, whether nuisance or na nuisance, when the matter complained of is not a nuisance per se, depends upon its location and the attendant circumstances; and the-plant in question is not a u convenient” place. — H. L. Cases, 648; Wood Nuis., p. 582, § 492;. 34 W. Ya. 804. II. — The…

1Opinion of the Court

DeNT, Judge :

The Huntington & Elenova Land Development Company filed its bill in chancery in the Circuit Court of Wayne county at the December Eules, 1892, against the Phoenix Powder Manufacturing Company, for the purpose of perpetually' enjoining the works of the defendant as a nuisance.

The allegations of the bill are in substance as follows, to wit: That the plaintiff is a corporation for the purpose of laying out towns and selling lots therein, and doing and engaging in all manner of manufacturing and developing business of all kinds; that it owns about two thousand acres of valuable lands…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. Phoenix Powder Manf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Mahoney Land Co. v. Cayuga Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Karcher v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Mullens v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Dimmett v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1819

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API