Hochfeld v. Portland
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Robert Tucker, Judge. In Banc. Proceeding by S. Hochfeld and others for a writ of review directed to the City of Portland and another. The writ was dismissed and plaintiffs appeal. On petition for rehearing. Former opinion reversed and set aside, and judgment of the trial court dismissing writ of review affirmed. In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
This is a writ .of review proceeding relative to a reassessment made by Ordinance No. 30,289 of the City of Portland, for the cost of improvement of East Oak Street, from Union Avenue to a point sixty-five feet east of the east line of East Sixth Street, in the City of Portland. The lower court found the reassessment proceedings regular and dismissed the writ. Plaintiff appeals.
This case is similar to the case of Brown v. Portland, post, p. 600 (190 Pac. 722), and the case of Cook et al. v. Portland, post, p. 000 (190 Pac. 726), in both *574of which cases an opinion has this day been rendered.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Cook v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cook v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Hochfeld v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- School District No. 48 v. Fair Dismissal Appeals BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973