Legal Opinion

Hochfeld v. Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1920Published

From Multnomah: Robert Tucker, Judge. In Banc. Proceeding by S. Hochfeld and others for a writ of review directed to the City of Portland and another. The writ was dismissed and plaintiffs appeal. On petition for rehearing. Former opinion reversed and set aside, and judgment of the trial court dismissing writ of review affirmed. In Banc.

1Opinion

Petition for Rehearing.

(192 Pac. 911.)

BEAN, J.

The original briefs in this case merely referred to the briefs in the cases of Brown v. Portland, the opinion to be found post, p. 600 (190 Pac. 722), and Cook v. Portland, post, p. 000 (190 Pac. 726). These cases were decided upon the question of the statute of limitations, and a like opinion was rendered in this case. In a petition for a rehearing in the present case of Hochfeld v. Portland, the former opinion being reported ante, p. 572 (190 Pac. 725, 192 Pac. 911), our attention is for the first time directed to *575the fact that ten years had not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hochfeld v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Brown v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hochfeld v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Cook v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API