Legal Opinion

People v. Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We have examined defendant’s claims on appeal and find them to be without merit. The evidence at the suppression hearing sufficiently demonstrated that defendant was not interrogated in violation of his right to counsel. Additionally, the evidence that complainant’s jaw was swollen and caused him pain for two weeks was sufficient to establish "physical injury” (see, Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; People v James, 133 AD2d 507, 509, lv denied 70 NY2d 933; People v Goico, 122 AD2d 576). Defendant was not entitled to have the charge of criminal facilitation in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. GoicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. People v. ChavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Ze-Jun WangNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API