Garrels, Ex Parte Elizabeth Ann
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtKeasler, J.
A defendant has a constitutional right to have her fate determined "before the first trier of fact." A trial judge may violate this right by ordering a mistrial over her objection; but if she consented to it, double jeopardy will not prevent her re-prosecution. Today we reiterate that, although consent may be "implied" from the totality of the circumstances, 3 it must nevertheless be supported by record-based evidence. Because the court of appeals found otherwise, we reverse.
I. FACTS
A. Trial
Elizabeth Ann Garrels, appellant in this case, was charged by information with the *520 misdemeanor offense…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Charles Clyde Ingram v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
- Ex Parte Amanda Marie Montoya v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
- Ex Parte Anthony Jordan Patterson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
- Ex Parte James Alfred Trimble, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
- Ex Parte James Kearns v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.