Legal Opinion

Garrels, Ex Parte Elizabeth Ann

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 2018No. PD-0710-17PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeasler, J.

A defendant has a constitutional right to have her fate determined "before the first trier of fact." A trial judge may violate this right by ordering a mistrial over her objection; but if she consented to it, double jeopardy will not prevent her re-prosecution. Today we reiterate that, although consent may be "implied" from the totality of the circumstances, 3 it must nevertheless be supported by record-based evidence. Because the court of appeals found otherwise, we reverse.

I. FACTS

A. Trial

Elizabeth Ann Garrels, appellant in this case, was charged by information with the *520 misdemeanor offense…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles Clyde Ingram v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2019
  2. Ex Parte Amanda Marie Montoya v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023
  3. Ex Parte Anthony Jordan Patterson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024
  4. Ex Parte James Alfred Trimble, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2020
  5. Ex Parte James Kearns v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API