Legal Opinion
Stamp Tech, Inc. v. Lydall/Thermal Acoustical, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 4, 2009No. 2007-494PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff Peter Blair, an injured worker, appeals from two decisions of the Caledonia Superior Court in favor of his empoyer Lydall/Thermal Acoustical, Inc. Plaintiffs arm was crushed by an industrial press while he was working as a temporary employee at Lydall’s St. Johnsbury plant. His suit against Lydall was based on two theories. First, plaintiff sought to collect from Lydall a $750,000 stipulated judgment entered in his favor against Stamp Tech, Inc., a firm that Lydall had hired to install safety devices on the press, claiming that Lydall had expressly agreed to indemnify Stamp…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corporation, Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Bacon v. LascellesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Payne v. RozendaalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
- Black v. Goodwin, Loomis & Britton, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Pierce v. RiggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Southwick v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Parsons Hill PartnershipSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Mueller v. Mueller and Joseph F. Mueller TrustSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- CASSANI v. HaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Ira Martel v. Connor Contracting, Inc., Jason Clark, and Stephen ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.