Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Riggs

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 24, 1987No. 86-505PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMahady, J.

This is a nuisance action in which plaintiff complains that the barking of dogs in a kennel maintained by defendants impairs the quiet enjoyment of his property. Plaintiff sought injunctive relief and monetary damages. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

Two issues are presented. The first is whether the trial court faced with a motion for summary judgment should have considered an affidavit filed by plaintiff with his complaint prior to defendants’ motion. The second is whether that affidavit created genuine issues of material fact sufficient to defeat the motion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Ralph H. Littlejohn, Jr. v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Jennings v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Cavanaugh v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Murray v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. Ross v. Times Mirror, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Levy v. Town of St. Albans Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Fitzgerald v. CongletonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  5. Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API